United States v. Rodney Spotsville

988 F.2d 125 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney SPOTSVILLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50256. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 2, 1993. * Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-1058-WJR-1; William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. APPEAL DISMISSED. Before SCHROEDER, DAVID R. THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The appellant Spotsville pleaded guilty to two counts of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). The district court sentenced him to fifty-one months incarceration, a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range. Spotsville appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred as a matter of law in failing to depart downward from the Guidelines. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. 3 * A district court's discretionary…