United States v. Mark A. Wood

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark A. WOOD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50358. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1992. Decided Feb. 23, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-88-0292-TJH; Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED. Before BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Mark Wood appeals his jury conviction for two counts of subscribing to a false tax return. See 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1). 3 A. Wood argues the warrant to search his office, which uncovered incriminating business records, lacked probable cause because the information forming the basis of the warrant was "stale." We give the magistrate's finding of probable cause deference. E.g., United States v. Angulo-Lopez, 791 F.2d 1394, 1396 (9th…