L. Valinsky v. Republic Factors Corp.

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. L. VALINSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REPUBLIC FACTORS CORP., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-91-5527-AWT; A. Wallace Tashima, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 L. Valinsky appeals the district court's dismissal of her action against Republic Factors Corp. ("Republic") for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court's dismissal of an action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992). We affirm…