Manly Willis v. United States Army

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manly WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15456. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-91-20091-WAI; William A. Ingram, Chief Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Manly Willis appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction of Willis's action against the United States Army. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 1 3 Willis was employed as a civil service employee of the Army at Fort Ord, California, working in food service. Willis was placed on disability status as a result of on-the-job injuries and previous medical conditions. Willis was referred to a position as a clerk due to his…