United States v. Michael Lee Thompson

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Lee THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30225. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CR-92-5-02-CRD; Carolyn R. Dimmick, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Michael Lee Thompson appeals his 92-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Thompson contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice. Specifically, he argues that insufficient evidence supported the district court's finding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Generally, we review for clear error the district…