Angela Valdez v. Robert Ayers

Good Law
988 F.2d 126·1993 WL 69167·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10704
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 199391-16463California632 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Angela VALDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert AYERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-16463. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1993. Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-89-00939-GGH; David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before CHOY, SCHROEDER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant-appellant Robert Ayers appeals the judgment imposed after a jury found him liable for compensatory damages to the appellee, Angela Valdez. This section 1983 action arose when Ayers, a correctional lieutenant at the Northern California Women's Facility, fired a taser gun at Valdez after she refused to submit to a mandatory strip search upon her arrival at the facility. Valdez later suffered a miscarriage. 3 The critical issue in this appeal is whether the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.