United States v. Warde Bradley Thompson

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warde Bradley THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30084. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 1993. * Decided March 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-91-60122-01-MRH; Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, POOLE and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Warde Bradley Thompson appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for manufacture of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Thompson argues that his conviction should be reversed because the district court failed to suppress evidence seized from his residence pursuant to an invalid search warrant. Thompson also appeals the district court's two-level enhancement of his sentence due to Thompson's possession of a firearm during the commission of a narcotics…