United States, for the Use and Benefit of a New York Corporation, Fischbach & Moore v. Leeth Construction, Inc., and Clark R. Powell Thomas S. Rhoades

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES, for the Use and Benefit of a New York Corporation, FISCHBACH & MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEETH CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant, and Clark R. Powell; Thomas S. Rhoades, Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-56142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. Decided Feb. 16, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, CV-90-0046-G; Earl B. Gilliam, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendants Clark R. Powell and Thomas S. Rhoades appeal the district court's denial of their motion for relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and we affirm. 3 * Standard of Review 4 We review the district court's denial of a motion to vacate a judgment under Rule 60(b) for an abuse of…