Ennis E. White v. Jesse Figueroa

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ennis E. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jesse FIGUEROA, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV 90-00208-WDB, William D. Browning, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. VACATED AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ennis Edward White, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against the defendants, prosecutors with the Pima County Attorney's Office. White contends that the prosecutors knowingly submitted perjured and false testimony in his criminal trial, and failed to disclose exculpatory information to the defense. We vacate and remand for further proceedings. 3 When a state prisoner challenges the…