United States v. Peter H. Thomas, United States of America v. Henry Lee Schulle, United States of America v. Michael E. Hilander

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter H. THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Lee SCHULLE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael E. HILANDER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30415, * 91-30449 * and 92-30208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. Decided Feb. 10, 1993. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing March 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; No. CR-90-1078-RJB, Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. MEMORANDUM ** Before TANG, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 Peter H. Thomas, Henry Lee Schulle, and Michael E. Hilander appeal their sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines on their guilty plea convictions for RICO offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c). 1 We affirm. 2…