United States v. Eva Patrick Verner

988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eva Patrick VERNER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50838, 92-50201 and 92-50316. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 1993. * Decided March 11, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-89-0831-RSWL-1, Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before D.W. NELSON, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eva Patrick Verner pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and four counts of wire fraud based on the fraudulent sale of two properties. She was sentenced to 30 months incarceration to be followed by three years of supervised release. Verner appeals the amount of the restitution order and the location of her supervised release. She also makes several arguments regarding the calculation and execution of her sentence. We reject each of her arguments. 3…