United States v. Keith A. Worthy
Opinion
Opinion
988 F.2d 126 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith A. WORTHY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-0567-AWT-02; A. Wallace Tashima, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Keith A. Worthy appeals his 21-month sentence, imposed following a jury conviction, for conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286 , and theft of United States money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 . Worthy contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level upward for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 and for refusing to adjust his offense level downward for a minor role in the offense pursuant to…