Paul A. Wright v. Veronica Rebeiro

Good Law
988 F.2d 127
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 199391-36087California1,770 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 127 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Veronica REBEIRO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 26, 1993. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing April 13, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CV-90-396-R; Barbara J. Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Before TANG, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Paul Wright appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his § 1983 claim. Wright claims on appeal that he was placed in administrative segregation and transferred to another prison in retaliation for the exercise of his rights of access to the courts and free speech, and in violation of his due process and equal protection rights. BACKGROUND FACTS 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.