Leroy Woods v. Richard O. Davis Lesley Portee

988 F.2d 127 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leroy WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard O. DAVIS; Lesley Portee, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15804. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1993. * Decided Feb. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-85-01872-RCB(MM); Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leroy Woods, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review a district court's imposition of sanctions under Rule 37 for abuse of discretion, Fjelstad v. American Honda Motor Co., 762 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1985), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Woods, who was incarcerated, filed a pro se complaint against two City of Mesa Police…