Frieda Korobkin Leonard Korobkin Leonard Korobkin Professional Corporation v. United States

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 3282·988 F.2d 975·1993 WL 65714·71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1245·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4471
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 199391-56243California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

The Korobkins were allegedly involved in several abusive tax shelter transactions, and were assessed over $300,000 in penalties under I.R.C. § 6700. People who disagree with a penalty assessment can contest it by (1) paying 15% of the assessment and filing an administrative refund claim within 30 days of notice of the penalty, (2) waiting until the IRS denies the claim or until 6 months elapse (whichever is earlier), and (3) filing suit in district court within 30 days after that. I.R.C. §§ 6703(c)(l)-(2). The Korobkins did steps (1) and (2), but waited too long on (3). The district court dismissed their claim, because once a plaintiff misses the six-month-plus-30-day deadline, the district court lacks jurisdiction over the refund suit unless the taxpayer pays the entire penalty first. Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145, 177 , 80 S.Ct. 630, 647 , 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960); Steele v. United States, 280 F.2d 89 (8th Cir.1960) (acknowledging the rule’s applicability to penalty assessments).

There’s a narrow exception to this jurisdictional rule for “divisible” assessments— taxes or penalties that are seen as merely the sum of several independent assessments triggered by separate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.