Friends Of The Payette v. Horseshoe Bend Hydroelectric Co.

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 3535·988 F.2d 989·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20530·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5011·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1960
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 199392-36611California3,856 words

Opinion

Opinion

988 F.2d 989 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,530 FRIENDS OF THE PAYETTE, and Idaho Rivers United, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HORSESHOE BEND HYDROELECTRIC CO.; United States Army Corps of Engineers; Robert Volz, District Engineer of United States Army Corps of Engineers, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36611. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1993. Decided March 19, 1993. Jim Jones, Boise, ID, for plaintiffs-appellants. D. Marc Haws, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boise, ID, David P. Hirschi, Salt Lake City, UT, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before: WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Two environmental groups allege that the Army Corps of Engineers violated the National Environmental Policy Act by issuing a dredge-and-fill permit for a hydroelectric project without preparing an environmental impact statement. Because we conclude that the Corps' action was not arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the action. 2 * On March 10, 1992, the Horseshoe Bend Hydroelectric Company began…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.