Matthews v. MacAnas

Bad Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 4027·990 F.2d 467·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6534·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2369
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 199391-56411California864 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 467 Robert H. MATTHEWS, Jr.; Ernie R. Sanders, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Edward A. MACANAS, Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation; Charles Butt, Special Agent, United States Custom Service; Larry Hedberg, Special Agent, Drug Enforcement Administration; Larry Courtney, Special Agent, Drug Enforcement Administration; John P. Pierce, Assistant United States Attorney, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-56411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided March 31, 1993. Ernie R. Sanders, and Robert H. Matthews, pro se. Paul E. Beckhart, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, CA, for respondents-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, SNEED and HALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Sanders and Matthews appeal pro se from the district court's dismissal of their constitutional tort action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). They argue that the district court erroneously concluded that (1) Sanders's claim was barred by the doctrine of qualified immunity and (2) Matthews's claim was barred by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.