Kyle Railways, Inc. v. Pacific Administration Services, Inc.

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 4494·990 F.2d 513·16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2032·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7480·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2618
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 199391-16391California2,651 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 513 16 Employee Benefits Cas. 2032 KYLE RAILWAYS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.; Adjustco, Inc., Successor in Interest to Pacific Administration Services, Inc.; Guarantee Mutual Life Company; National Benefit Resources Group Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16391. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. Decided April 9, 1993. Bradley A. Silva, Lang, Richert & Patch, Fresno, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Richard E. McGreevy, Leach, McGreevy & Eliassen, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Pacific Admin. Services. Glenn E. Westreich, Rosenblum, Parish & Isaacs, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Guarantee Mut. Life Co. David J. Garthe and Bruce Winkleman, Boornazian, Jensen & Garthe, Oakland, CA, for defendant-appellee National Ben. Resources Group. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before FARRIS, POOLE, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: 1 Kyle Railway, Inc. ("Kyle") sued Pacific Administration Services, and its successor in interest Adjustco, Inc., ("Pacific"); Guarantee Mutual Life…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.