Thomas E. Charlton Judith C. Charlton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 5021·990 F.2d 1161·1993 WL 120341·71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1595·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 199391-70616California939 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

Thomas E. and Judith C. Charlton (taxpayers) appeal from an order of the United States Tax Court denying their motion to vacate or revise the tax court’s earlier decision in favor of the Commissioner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482 (a) (1988), and we affirm.

I.

Taxpayer Thomas E. Charlton was a limited partner in Diabetics CME Associates (Diabetics). Diabetics was a losing proposition, and taxpayers claimed deductions on their 1981 and 1982 joint federal income tax returns based on Mr. Charlton’s distributive share of Diabetics’ losses.

In connection with an audit of their 1981 and 1982 returns, taxpayers consented to an extension of the time to assess tax for those two tax years. In 1986, the IRS disallowed the losses attributable to the Diabetics investment, and assessed a deficiency against taxpayers, together with interest and penalties based on that disallowance.

Taxpayers petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiency. After the tax court sustained the imposition of the deficiency, taxpayers moved the court to vacate or revise its decision. This motion was based in part upon taxpayers’ new claim that assessment of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.