Tyrone Browder v. Charles Marshall Attorney General of the State of California

990 F.2d 1255 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tyrone BROWDER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles MARSHALL; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-55676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 2, 1993. * Decided March 23, 1993. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tyrone Browder appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , challenging his bench trial conviction for robbery and murder by a California court. Browder alleges various constitutional violations from: (1) the trial judge's grant of testimonial immunity to several codefendants and (2) the trial judge's reading of a preliminary hearing transcript in which several witnesses made statements inculpating Browder. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. I. JURY TRIAL WAIVER 3 Browder claims that he was not informed prior…