Bassett v. Hastings

990 F.2d 1255 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William B. BASSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles HASTINGS, Yavapai County Attorney; Buck Buchanon, Yavapai County Sheriff; Robert Carson, Captain, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 24, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Bassett, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in Bassett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Yavapai County officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Bassett filed a civil rights action against county officials in their…