Nathaniel C. Anderson v. San Diego County Department of Public Works

990 F.2d 1255 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nathaniel C. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55995. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 18, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nathaniel Anderson appeals pro se from the district court's judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of the County of San Diego in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Anderson contends that the district court (1) erred by finding that the County did not discriminate against him on the basis of his race or religion, and (2) abused its discretion by excluding allegedly relevant testimony at trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. A. Title VII 3 We review for clear error the district court's…