Adam F. Cyrulik v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
990 F.2d 1256·1993 WL 98817·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14048
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 199392-70183California1,512 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1256 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Adam F. CYRULIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70183. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 2, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Adam F. Cyrulik, a native and citizen of Poland, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) order affirming the immigration judge's (IJ) decision finding Cyrulik deportable and denying Cyrulik's applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We deny the petition for review. 3 We review the BIA's denial of asylum for abuse of discretion. Acewicz v. INS, No. 91-70257, slip op. 969, 978 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 1993). We review the BIA's factual findings under the substantial evidence standard. Id. We review de novo the BIA's determinations on questions of law. Desir v. Ilchert, 840…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.