David Allen Defusco v. John Crabtree, Warden, Fci, Fpc Sheridan, Oregon

990 F.2d 1256 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David Allen DEFUSCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John CRABTREE, Warden, FCI, FPC Sheridan, Oregon, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35803. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. * Decided March 30, 1993. Before KILKENNY, TANG and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Allen Hagen DeFusco appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his Bivens-type action. Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We affirm. 3 * DeFusco, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institute in Sheridan, Oregon alleges that his constitutional rights were violated by Warden John Crabtree when he was placed in administrative detention without being given proper notice of the reasons for the detention, and when he was denied access to legal materials and files while in administrative detention. 4 In his complaint in district court, DeFusco requests both monetary damages and…