Hilton Lawrence Brown v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden

990 F.2d 1256 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hilton Lawrence BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 25, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hilton Lawrence Brown, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying him leave to file "a number of papers bearing different headings, if any, and different case names," which the district court found "incomprehensible" pursuant to a district court pre-filing review order entered in 1988. 1 We affirm. 3 Based on our review of the complaint in this case, we conclude that the district court acted properly in denying Brown leave to file. The district court's pre-filing review order is designed to prevent "mailing[§ that] are incomprehensible and do not appear to state any claims upon which…