Davis v. Beko

Good Law
990 F.2d 1256·1993 WL 78072·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14035
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 199392-15483California2,686 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1256 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harold A. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William P. BEKO, former District Judge; Philip H. Dunleavy, Nye County District Attorney; George B. Devel, former Nye County Deputy District Attorney; Jeffrey D. Morrison, former Nye County Deputy District Attorney; NYE COUNTY; Ronald E. Floyd; John F. Smith, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15483. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 11, 1993. Decided March 19, 1993. Before GOODWIN, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Harold Davis (Davis) appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 claims against various defendants, including Judge William Beko (Beko), individual members of the grand jury, the prosecuting attorney, Philip Dunleavy (Dunleavy) and an investigator for the district attorney's office, John Adams (Adams). The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.