Cano v. Jouler

990 F.2d 1256 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramon CANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. JOULER, Correctional Officer; A. Bell, Program Services Manager; D. Northealt, Assistant Supervisor; G.W. Balwin, Superintendent; D. Binschus, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36554. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 17, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Cano, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his right of access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728, 731 (9th Cir.1989). "A party opposing a properly supported motion for summary…