Vern W. Englert v. Small Business Administration

Good Law
990 F.2d 1257·1993 WL 115217·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 199392-16849California614 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vern W. ENGLERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16849. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Vern W. Englert appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action against the Small Business Administration. Englert alleged that he was mistreated and terminated because of discrimination based upon his handicap in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 To preserve an appeal of the underlying judgment, a notice of appeal must be filed within sixty days after the date of entry of the judgment. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1); see also United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., 982 F.2d 394, 396 (9th Cir.1992). The time limitations of Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.