Roderick Fairchild v. W.T. Flanagan, Deputy, Detective Sgt. Badge No. M-9, Mohave County Sheriff's Office

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roderick FAIRCHILD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.T. FLANAGAN, Deputy, Detective Sgt. Badge No. M-9, Mohave County Sheriff's Office, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16719. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 5, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roderick Fairchild appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In his action, Fairchild claims that Flanagan, a law enforcement officer, violated his constitutional rights by making false statements in an affidavit of probable cause and obtaining a search warrant based on that affidavit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992). 4 "On summary…