Francisco Javier Echeverri-Perez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
990 F.2d 1257·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13847
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 199391-70218California1,520 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Francisco Javier ECHEVERRI-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued June 5, 1992. Withdrawn from Submission Oct. 20, 1992. Resubmitted March 18, 1993. Decided March 25, 1993. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and PRO, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Petitioner Francisco Javier Echeverri-Perez ("Echeverri-Perez") appeals an affirmance by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") of a deportation order. Echeverri-Perez claims that the order is invalid because he never received notice of the deportation hearing. In June 1992, we stayed deportation and remanded this case so that an immigration judge could hear Echeverri-Perez' motion to reopen his case; this motion recently was rejected. We now affirm the deportation order, finding that Echeverri-Perez had reasonable opportunity to be present…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.