Henry J. Foster v. L. Bradley, Correctional Counselor Sarita J. Tambellini
Opinion
Opinion
990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry J. FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. BRADLEY, Correctional Counselor; Sarita; J. Tambellini, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16158. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993 * Decided April 5, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Henry J. Foster, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Foster contends that the district court erred by finding that he had failed to state a cognizable claim under section 1983. He claims he suffered emotional distress when a prison counselor erroneously asked him to sign a sex offender registration form prior to being released on parole. 1 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.1991), cert.…