Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Raymond Carey. v. Leif D. Soderling

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP., Raymond Carey., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leif D. SODERLING, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-15830. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 5, 1993. * Decided March 23, 1993. Before FLETCHER, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leif, Jay, Sydney, and Evelyn Soderling, as well as several businesses and trusts collectively called the Soderling Interests, including Snode Construction, Inc., appeal two interlocutory orders of the district court, rendered on April 22, 1991 and May 6, 1991, respectively. We dismiss the appeal of the May 6 order because we lack jurisdiction, and we dismiss the appeal of the April 22 order in part because we lack jurisdiction, and in part because this court has already decided the issues raised in the appeal. 3 The FDIC filed a motion for partial dismissal, alleging that Snode Construction is not a proper…