Harrison v. Stokke

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerry D. HARRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel R. STOKKE, individually and in his official capacity as a Seattle Police Detective; Jane Doe Stokke, and the marital community thereof; Seattle Police Department, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-35876. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; No. CV-89-627-JCC, John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerry Harrison, a Washington State prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1 Harrison contends that Stokke, acting in accord with Seattle Police Department policy, violated Harrison's constitutional right to due process by using a photo…