F. Farah Etemad v. United States of America Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. F. Farah ETEMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-55735. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 F. Farah Etemad appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of her discrimination action against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that the EEOC improperly investigated and processed her EEOC charges. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Oscar v. University Students Co-operative Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992). Our review is limited to the contents of the…