Farrar v. Hall

990 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephen Lewis FARRAR, and all inmates in the State of Oregon Department of Corrections Prisons and Jails similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank Leslie HALL, Director, Department of Corrections, and all unknown defendants, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36595. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 16, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stephen Lewis Farrar, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action 1 as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and affirm. 3 Farrar filed a complaint alleging a violation of his constitutional rights arising from the defendants' practice of debiting funds…