Aaron B. Lee v. Alta Pacific Group

990 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Aaron B. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALTA PACIFIC GROUP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 7, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Aaron B. Lee appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Alta Pacific Group, and the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion for reconsideration in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Title VII) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 . Lee contends that the district court erred by finding that his action was time-barred. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. Scholar v. Pacific Bell, 963 F.2d 264, 266 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 196 (1992).…