Thomas Ray McKee and Don A. Herman v. Booth Gardner

Good Law
990 F.2d 1258·1993 WL 77227·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13868
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199392-36586California635 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas Ray MCKEE, Plaintiff, and Don A. HERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Booth GARDNER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36586. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 18, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Don A. Herman appeals the district court's dismissal without prejudice of this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action brought by Herman and another Oregon state prisoner, Thomas McKee, challenging the conditions of confinement at the Washington Correction Center. We affirm. 3 Herman is the only plaintiff who signed the notice of appeal. A pro se plaintiff must sign the notice of appeal. See Carter v. Commissioner, 784 F.2d 1006, 1008 (9th Cir.1986). We therefore have jurisdiction only over Herman's appeal. The appeal is dismissed as to the other plaintiffs. 4 Herman argues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.