David Paul Reumont v. Eddie Ylst, Warden
Opinion
Opinion
990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David Paul REUMONT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55700. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 1993. * Decided March 18, 1993. 1 Before D.W. NELSON, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Petitioner, David Paul Reumont, was convicted on two counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under age fourteen and two counts of oral copulation with a child under age fourteen. He was sentenced to twelve years in the California State penal system. Reumont filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The district court dismissed the action on the merits. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We affirm. FACTS 4 After Reumont's conviction and sentence, a post-conviction evidentiary hearing was held to show cause why Reumont was not entitled to relief pursuant to…