David Paul Reumont v. Eddie Ylst, Warden

Good Law
990 F.2d 1259·1993 WL 77217·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199392-55700California2,791 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David Paul REUMONT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55700. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 1993. * Decided March 18, 1993. 1 Before D.W. NELSON, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Petitioner, David Paul Reumont, was convicted on two counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under age fourteen and two counts of oral copulation with a child under age fourteen. He was sentenced to twelve years in the California State penal system. Reumont filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The district court dismissed the action on the merits. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We affirm. FACTS 4 After Reumont's conviction and sentence, a post-conviction evidentiary hearing was held to show cause why Reumont was not entitled to relief pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.