Evan Rapsomanikis v. U.S. Dept. Of Health and Human Services

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Evan RAPSOMANIKIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15862. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided March 8, 1993. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Evans Rapsomanikis appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, see Burns Int'l, Inc. v. Western Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 978 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 On October 16, 1991, a federal magistrate judge, upon application by an agent of the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), issued two inspection warrants authorizing FDA agents to inspect the Paradise Pain Clinic ("PPC") and the Kytarron Energy Corporation ("KEC") located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The agents specifically were to…