William A. Reinke v. United States

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William A. REINKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55799. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 5, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William A. Reinke appeals pro se the district court's denial of his fifth pro se motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The district found the motion to be without merit. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , and we affirm. I. Procedural History 3 On 24 February 1986, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California filed an information against Reinke alleging two counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 . The information alleged that Reinke was employed by the Northrop Corporation (Northrop) as an engineering specialist. Reinke's alleged responsibilities included the…