Victor L. Reed v. The County of San Diego Does 1-10

Good Law
990 F.2d 1259·1993 WL 115233·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13997
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 199390-55369California1,450 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor L. REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-55369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor L. Reed, a former employee of the County of San Diego (County), appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging, amongst other claims, a Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., employment discrimination claim against the County. The district court dismissed the Title VII claim without prejudice because Reed failed to comply with the court's orders that he prepare for and proceed with trial. Reed also challenges the district court's partial summary judgment for the County pursuant to stipulation on Reed's non-Title VII claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Title VII…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.