Alvin Larry Ryals, Jr. v. George Ingle

Good Law
990 F.2d 1259·1993 WL 98784·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 199392-15776California1,128 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alvin Larry RYALS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. George INGLE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-15776. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1993. * Decided April 5, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alvin Larry Ryals, Jr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 Ryals raises several contentions in his petition. First, he contends that his confession of oral copulation with a child under 14 was coerced because he was threatened by the arresting officer. This contention is without merit. 4 To show that a confession was involuntary, a defendant must demonstrate that the government obtained the statement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.