Ernestine Petitt v. Martin Marietta Corporation, International Steel Home Insurance Co. United States Federal District Court

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernestine PETITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION, International Steel; Home Insurance Co.; United States Federal District Court, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55690. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernestine Petitt appeals pro se the district court's order granting dismissal of her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) in favor of Martin Marietta Aluminum (Marietta), Home Insurance Company (Home Insurance) and the United States District Court (USDC) in her action under 5 U.S.C. § 552a, Title VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983, and 1985. Petitt alleged that (1) she was denied proper medical treatment while working for Marietta, (2) Home Insurance did not…