Paulisich v. Aispuro

Good Law
990 F.2d 1259·1993 WL 89066·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13981
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 199391-15939California2,264 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clara PAULISICH, and Pearlita Martinez, as Administrators of the Estate of William Thomas Martinez, and individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernie AISPURO, individually and as Warden of California State Prison-Corcoran; Marv Meske, individually and as Associate Warden of California State Prison-Corcoran; Robert Christian, individually and as Corrections Officer of California State Prison-Corcoran; James Zamora, individually and as Corrections Officer of California State Prison-Corcoran, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15939. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred July 23, 1992. Resubmitted Oct. 27, 1992. Decided March 29, 1993. Before CANBY, REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Pearlita Martinez and Carla Paulisich appeal the district court's summary judgment dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages. Martinez and Paulisich (hereinafter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.