Norma Elizabeth Padilla-Hernandez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
990 F.2d 1259·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13977
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 199392-70227California924 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norma Elizabeth PADILLA-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70227. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 19, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Norma Elizabeth Padilla-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) summary dismissal of her appeal from an immigration judge's (IJ) decision finding her deportable as charged and denying her applications for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) and 1253(h). The BIA dismissed the appeal for failure to specify adequately the grounds for appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(1-a)(i). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 "Although our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.