Abraham Padilla-Lopez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abraham PADILLA-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70513. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 1993. Decided March 18, 1993. Before PREGERSON, BOOCHEVER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Abraham Padilla-Lopez seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "Board"). That order denies Padilla-Lopez's application for a waiver of deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). Padilla-Lopez contends that the Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals abused their discretion by failing to consider his close relationship with Maria and Marco Corral ("the Corrals"). He also contends that the Immigration Judge erred by requiring a showing of rehabilitation, and by failing to consider Padilla-Lopez's rehabilitation. We affirm.…