Purcell v. Miller

990 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. June PURCELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard MILLER, individually and in his capacity as a detective in the Boise City Police Department; City of Boise, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35969. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before WRIGHT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 June Purcell appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of Detective Richard Miller of the Boise City Police Department and the City of Boise ("the City") in her eight-count complaint alleging 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights claims and state tort claims. Purcell's claims stem from the seizure of her gun collection pursuant to a search warrant issued on the strength of FBI Special Agent Kenneth Kaminski's affidavit, which contains allegedly false information provided by Miller. The district court…