Arthur L. Shoot, Merle L. Royse v. Vera Roop Lawrence Kincheloe, Warden, James Blodgett

990 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur L. SHOOT, Plaintiff, Merle L. Royse, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vera ROOP; Lawrence Kincheloe, Warden, Defendants, James Blodgett, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided March 16, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Merle L. Royse, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Royse contends that his first amendment rights have been violated by the Washington State Penitentiary's policy of prohibiting prisoners from receiving most mail order catalogs and making toll-free telephone calls. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and review de novo. Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728, 731 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment should be…