Stead Industries, Inc., In re

Good Law
990 F.2d 1260·1993 WL 89053·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14111
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 199391-16697California420 words

Opinion

Opinion

990 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re STEAD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nevada corporation, dba Hoyt Heater Company, Debtor. Stephen LANNES, Appellant, v. UNSECURED CREDITORS' COMMITTEE; Litigation Committee; Stead Industries, Inc.; State Inc., Appellees. No. 91-16697. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 11, 1993. * Decided March 29, 1993. Before NORRIS, HALL and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stephen Lannes appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's order dismissing his appeal as moot. The bankruptcy court approved a compromise of Debtor's cause of action. That order was not stayed pending appeal. The settlement was consummated and the underlying lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice. 3 An appeal becomes moot when, in the absence of a stay, events occur so that it becomes impossible for the appellate court to fashion effective relief. In re Roberts Farms, Inc., 652 F.2d 793 , 797 (9th Cir.1981); In re Combined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.