Strowski v. Parnell
Opinion
Opinion
990 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Margaret H. STROWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorna PARNELL; John P. Shook, Superior Court Judge; Cary H. Nishimoto; Kenneth W. Gale; Lois A. Smaltz; Frank S. Zolin; James H. Dempsey, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56057. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1993. * Decided April 14, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Margaret Strowski appeals pro se the district court's denial of her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that five California Superior Court judges and a former and current clerk of the superior court violated her civil rights in connection with a state court lawsuit. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion, and we will reverse " 'only upon a clear showing…